Case Study · Nonprofit UX · AZFriends.org

Operation
Pawfection

A full usability study and redesign of AZFriends.org — identifying friction in adoption, donation, and volunteer flows, then redesigning to increase conversions and emotional connection.

My Role
UX Researcher & Designer
Client
AZFriends.org · Nonprofit
Methods
Heuristic Eval · User Testing · Surveys
Tools
Figma · Maze · Nielsen's 10
AZFriends.org redesign — Operation Pawfection
Overview

A nonprofit with a strong mission — and a website getting in the way

AZFriends.org is a volunteer-based nonprofit dedicated to rescuing and rehoming animals in Gilbert, AZ. The site serves as the primary tool for donations, adoptions, and volunteer recruitment — but usability issues were limiting user efficiency and reducing conversions. I conducted a full UX audit across the site using heuristic evaluation, user surveys, and task-based usability testing, then redesigned the highest-impact areas.

80%
of users said the site looked trustworthy
4/5
found navigation confusing or inconsistent
93%
average task success rate across 6 core tasks
60%
would return if adoption & donation flows improved
Research Methodology

Multi-method approach — qualitative and quantitative

To evaluate AZFriends.org's usability I combined multiple research methods to get both behavioral and attitudinal data — understanding not just what users did, but why they struggled.

🔍 Heuristic Evaluation — Nielsen's 10 Principles
📋 Online User Surveys — 5 participants
🗣️ In-depth Interviews
Task-based Usability Testing — 6 core tasks
📊 Pre & Post-test Questionnaires
🗺️ Observation Sheets — paths, timing, comments

Three core task scenarios were tested: Volunteer Flow — locate and sign up for a shift; Adoption Flow — find pet details and review adoption requirements; Donation Flow — navigate donation options and understand fund use.

Key Findings

Trust was there. Usability wasn't.

The research surfaced a clear pattern: users trusted and liked AZFriends as an organization — but the website created unnecessary friction at every critical conversion point. 80% trusted the org but 60% still wouldn't return without UX improvements.

🧭
Inconsistent Navigation
4 out of 5 users found navigation confusing or inconsistent between pages. The footer included many links not present in the top nav — creating a disjointed mental model.
📋
Adoption Info Buried
Important adoption instructions were hidden in long paragraphs. Users struggled to find key actions like filling out the form and didn't understand what to do next.
🐾
Pet Listings Overwhelming
100% of evaluators said the pet section needed better organization. No filters for age, size, or sex — users had to click into every profile to understand if a pet was right for them.
💸
Donation Flow Confusing
100% completed the donation task, but 4 out of 5 struggled with pet-specific donations. Users had to navigate away and back just to find a pet's name to include in a donation.
"I had to go back and forth just to find the pet's name for the donation."
"I'm not sure where to go next."
Redesign Recommendations

4 high-impact changes

Each recommendation was prioritized by severity and impact on conversion — directly tied to the usability findings from testing.

High
Navigation was inconsistent between pages — the footer included links absent from the top nav, and the "Adopt Today" CTA wasn't prominent or context-aware.
→ Redesign top nav to include Adopt, Volunteer, and Donate — matching footer for consistency. Enhance CTA to reflect user intent at each stage.
High
Pet profile pages were text-heavy and poorly formatted. Key details like adoption hours, form links, and personality traits were buried in paragraphs with no visual hierarchy.
→ Redesign pet profiles with organized sections (About, Adoption Details), bullet points for personality traits, consistent icons (✅ Vaccinated), and embedded "Consultation Form" CTA buttons.
Medium
Adoption instructions were buried in long paragraphs. Users didn't understand what step came next and missed the key action (filling out the form).
→ Restructure adoption info with bold headings, shorter paragraphs, and clear CTAs ("Start Your Adoption"). Add visual support with images and action buttons.
Medium
Pet listing page was visually overwhelming — no filters, inconsistent card layout, key details missing. Users couldn't compare pets without clicking into each individual profile.
→ Redesign listings with structured cards including Age, Sex, Size filters at top. Show consistent pet info (age, breed, weight) directly beneath each photo with improved spacing.
The Redesign

Before & after

The redesigned homepage introduced a cleaner hero, improved navigation structure, clear CTAs for adoption and volunteering, and a contact section — all in a warmer, more emotionally engaging visual system.

Redesigned AZFriends.org — tablet view
Redesigned homepage — tablet
Redesigned AZFriends.org — full page
Full redesigned page — desktop
Outcome & Reflection

When design serves a mission

"AZFriends.org is a strong organization with a clear mission — but the website was creating friction for users trying to help. Every improvement directly served more animals finding homes."

This project reinforced how much UX friction can undermine genuine user intent. People came to AZFriends.org already motivated — to adopt, donate, volunteer. The website was the barrier. By fixing navigation consistency, restructuring pet profiles, adding meaningful filters, and clarifying the donation flow, every change directly translated to fewer abandoned sessions and more successful adoptions. It's one of the most meaningful problem spaces I've worked in — where good UX has a direct real-world impact on animal welfare.

4
High-impact recommendations prioritized and redesigned
5
Participants tested across 6 core task flows
93%
Average task success rate — baseline established
Adoption conversion potential through friction removal
Heuristic Evaluation Usability Testing User Surveys Nonprofit UX Navigation Design Conversion Optimization Information Architecture Figma Nielsen's 10 Maze